{"id":6032,"date":"2026-07-21T06:39:48","date_gmt":"2026-07-21T06:39:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aluseg.com\/indice-de-rendas\/"},"modified":"2026-07-21T11:26:03","modified_gmt":"2026-07-21T11:26:03","slug":"rent-index-portugal","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/aluseg.com\/en\/rent-index-portugal\/","title":{"rendered":"Aluseg Rent Index: Rents by Municipality in Portugal (2025\u20132026)"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Rents in Portugal grew by 7.4% in 2025 \u2014 more than triple the legal limit<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Analysis of median rents by municipality and property type in Mainland Portugal and the Islands, based on 42 037 records. The permitted legal increase in 2026 is only 2.24%.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t

Source: Aluseg Rent Index (INE, residential rents 2024 and 2025). Property type reference: T2. July 2026 edition.<\/p>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n \t\t\t

Residential rents in Portugal rose, on average, by 7.4% from 2024 to 2025<\/strong> \u2014 more than triple the legal update coefficient of 2.24% that landlords can apply to active contracts in 2026. The Aluseg Rent Index gathers median rents by municipality, district, and property type, from 42 037 records (primary source: INE), already including data from the 1st quarter of 2026<\/strong>. This page is updated every new quarter.<\/p>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n \t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t+<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t0<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t%<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t

Increase in the national median rent (T2) in 2025 \u2014 vs. 2.24%<\/strong> legal coefficient for 2026<\/p>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n

\n \t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t0<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t%<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t

180 out of 206 municipalities<\/strong> rose above the legal limit of 2.24%<\/p>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n

\n \t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t+<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t0<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t%<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t

Largest municipal increase: Vouzela<\/strong> (Viseu), from \u20ac362 to \u20ac551 for a T2<\/p>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n \t\t\t

The national median rent, by property type<\/h2>\n\t\t\t\t\t

Across all property types, the year-over-year increase ranged between 7.3% and 7.5% \u2014 well above the legal limit applicable to annual updates.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Property Type<\/th>\n2024<\/th>\n2025<\/th>\nVariation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
T0<\/td>\n408\u20ac<\/td>\n439\u20ac<\/td>\n+7,5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
T1<\/td>\n623\u20ac<\/td>\n670\u20ac<\/td>\n+7,5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
T2<\/td>\n683\u20ac<\/td>\n734\u20ac<\/td>\n+7,4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
T3<\/td>\n824\u20ac<\/td>\n885\u20ac<\/td>\n+7,3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
T4+<\/td>\n846\u20ac<\/td>\n909\u20ac<\/td>\n+7,4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Ready to Assess the Value <\/span><\/span>of Your Rental?<\/h2><\/div><\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/i>\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tTry the Simulator<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/i>\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tCreate Lease Agreement<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t
\n \t\t\t

2026 Update: what the 1st quarter shows<\/h2>\n\t\t\t\t\t

The latest data from INE (1st quarter of 2026, 24 urban municipalities) confirm that rents remain about 7.7% above<\/strong> the same period of the previous year. However, for the first time, a sign of cooling emerges: the median urban rent retreated slightly compared to the peak in the 4th quarter of 2025, and in 15 of the 24 municipalities the rent decreased in the quarter<\/strong>. The exception is Lisbon, which continues to rise and has surpassed \u20ac1,600 for a 2-bedroom apartment (T2).<\/p>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n \t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t+<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t0<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t%<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t

Average year-over-year increase in urban rents in the 1st quarter of 2026<\/p>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n

\n \t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t0<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t out of 24<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t

urban municipalities where rent retreated<\/strong> compared to the previous quarter \u2014 first sign of cooling<\/p>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n

\n \t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t0<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\u20ac<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t

Lisbon continues to rise (+5.2% in the quarter) \u2014 the exception that contradicts the periphery<\/p>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n \t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n
Median rent of a 2-bedroom apartment (T2) in the 24 urban municipalities (INE quarterly series). Peak in the 4th quarter of 2025.<\/div>\n
\n
2025 Q1<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\u20ac931<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
2025 Q2<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\u20ac979<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
2025 Q3<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\u20ac996<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
2025 Q4<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\u20ac1012<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
2026 Q1<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\u20ac1002<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t

Year-over-year (compared to 2025-Q1) and quarterly (compared to 2025-Q4) variation of the median rent for a 2-bedroom apartment (T2), by municipality:<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
#<\/th>\nMunicipality<\/th>\nRent T2 (2026-T1)<\/th>\nYear-over-year<\/th>\nQuarterly<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1<\/td>\nLisboa<\/strong><\/td>\n1617\u20ac<\/td>\n+8,9%<\/span><\/td>\n+5,2%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nCascais<\/strong><\/td>\n1424\u20ac<\/td>\n+3,9%<\/span><\/td>\n-5,1%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nOeiras<\/strong><\/td>\n1370\u20ac<\/td>\n+7,6%<\/span><\/td>\n+1,3%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nAlmada<\/strong><\/td>\n1278\u20ac<\/td>\n+18,3%<\/span><\/td>\n+2,1%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nFunchal<\/strong><\/td>\n1247\u20ac<\/td>\n+9,8%<\/span><\/td>\n+2,7%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nPorto<\/strong><\/td>\n1186\u20ac<\/td>\n+6,6%<\/span><\/td>\n+0,3%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nOdivelas<\/strong><\/td>\n1163\u20ac<\/td>\n+5,3%<\/span><\/td>\n-5,3%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nAmadora<\/strong><\/td>\n1136\u20ac<\/td>\n+4,3%<\/span><\/td>\n-2,0%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\nMatosinhos<\/strong><\/td>\n1056\u20ac<\/td>\n+12,3%<\/span><\/td>\n+4,1%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nLoures<\/strong><\/td>\n1052\u20ac<\/td>\n+9,2%<\/span><\/td>\n-7,0%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\nSeixal<\/strong><\/td>\n1043\u20ac<\/td>\n+3,9%<\/span><\/td>\n-1,9%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\nVila Franca de Xira<\/strong><\/td>\n1035\u20ac<\/td>\n+11,2%<\/span><\/td>\n-1,3%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\nSintra<\/strong><\/td>\n1016\u20ac<\/td>\n+5,3%<\/span><\/td>\n-3,9%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\nSet\u00fabal<\/strong><\/td>\n1007\u20ac<\/td>\n+4,2%<\/span><\/td>\n-2,3%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\nVila Nova de Gaia<\/strong><\/td>\n902\u20ac<\/td>\n+6,8%<\/span><\/td>\n-4,8%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\nMaia<\/strong><\/td>\n887\u20ac<\/td>\n+12,5%<\/span><\/td>\n+1,9%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\nCoimbra<\/strong><\/td>\n854\u20ac<\/td>\n+6,9%<\/span><\/td>\n+0,4%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\nGondomar<\/strong><\/td>\n801\u20ac<\/td>\n+13,0%<\/span><\/td>\n-3,0%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19<\/td>\nLeiria<\/strong><\/td>\n768\u20ac<\/td>\n+7,1%<\/span><\/td>\n+7,5%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20<\/td>\nBraga<\/strong><\/td>\n762\u20ac<\/td>\n+4,2%<\/span><\/td>\n-2,2%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21<\/td>\nSanta Maria da Feira<\/strong><\/td>\n639\u20ac<\/td>\n+8,1%<\/span><\/td>\n-0,4%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22<\/td>\nVila Nova de Famalic\u00e3o<\/strong><\/td>\n618\u20ac<\/td>\n+7,2%<\/span><\/td>\n-2,9%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23<\/td>\nBarcelos<\/strong><\/td>\n608\u20ac<\/td>\n-1,9%<\/span><\/td>\n-5,9%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24<\/td>\nGuimar\u00e3es<\/strong><\/td>\n587\u20ac<\/td>\n+9,3%<\/span><\/td>\n-1,9%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n
\n \t\t\t

Note: the quarterly series covers 24 urban municipalities (district capitals and the Lisbon and Porto metropolitan areas), a different sample from the national annual series of 206 municipalities presented below.<\/p>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n

\n \t\t\t

Rent increases by district (2-bedroom, 2024 \u2192 2025)<\/h2>\n\t\t\t\t\t

Sorted by the year-over-year change in the median rent for a 2-bedroom apartment. The line marks the legal coefficient for 2026 (2.24%): only Portalegre falls below it, and only Madeira recorded a decrease.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n
Yellow line = legal update limit for 2026 (2.24%). Almost all districts are well above it.<\/div>\n
\n
Santar\u00e9m<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+14.0%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Azores<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+12.5%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Braga<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+11.4%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Coimbra<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+10.2%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Guarda<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+10.2%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Bragan\u00e7a<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+10.2%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Leiria<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+9.5%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Aveiro<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+9.4%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Porto<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+8.7%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Set\u00fabal<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+8.4%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Beja<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+8.0%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Faro<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+7.9%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Viana do Castelo<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+7.0%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Viseu<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+7.0%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Lisbon<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+6.5%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\u00c9vora<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+5.8%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Vila Real<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+5.7%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Castelo Branco<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+3.1%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Portalegre<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
+0.5%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Madeira<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
-4.9%<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n
\n \t\t\t

The 15 municipalities where rent increased the most<\/h2>\n\t\t\t\t\t

Year-over-year change in the median rent for a 2-bedroom apartment (municipalities with a reference rent over \u20ac350). Vouzela leads with a 52% increase.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
#<\/th>\nMunicipality<\/th>\nDistrict<\/th>\nRent T2 2025<\/th>\nVariation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1<\/td>\nVouzela<\/strong><\/td>\nViseu<\/td>\n551\u20ac<\/td>\n+52,3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nAmares<\/strong><\/td>\nBraga<\/td>\n546\u20ac<\/td>\n+33,0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nMonchique<\/strong><\/td>\nFaro<\/td>\n665\u20ac<\/td>\n+28,9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nAljustrel<\/strong><\/td>\nBeja<\/td>\n697\u20ac<\/td>\n+28,1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nVelas<\/strong><\/td>\nA\u00e7ores<\/td>\n551\u20ac<\/td>\n+26,3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nPorto de M\u00f3s<\/strong><\/td>\nLeiria<\/td>\n514\u20ac<\/td>\n+25,1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nSanto Tirso<\/strong><\/td>\nPorto<\/td>\n500\u20ac<\/td>\n+23,0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nAzambuja<\/strong><\/td>\nLisboa<\/td>\n709\u20ac<\/td>\n+22,0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\nFelgueiras<\/strong><\/td>\nPorto<\/td>\n440\u20ac<\/td>\n+21,6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nVieira do Minho<\/strong><\/td>\nBraga<\/td>\n507\u20ac<\/td>\n+21,0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\nSoure<\/strong><\/td>\nCoimbra<\/td>\n501\u20ac<\/td>\n+21,0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\nFafe<\/strong><\/td>\nBraga<\/td>\n436\u20ac<\/td>\n+19,6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\nVila Verde<\/strong><\/td>\nBraga<\/td>\n535\u20ac<\/td>\n+19,4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\nParedes de Coura<\/strong><\/td>\nViana do Castelo<\/td>\n422\u20ac<\/td>\n+19,1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\nOliveira de Frades<\/strong><\/td>\nViseu<\/td>\n493\u20ac<\/td>\n+17,9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n
\n \t\t\t

Where renting costs the most<\/h2>\n\t\t\t\t\t

Median rent for a 2-bedroom apartment in 2025, by municipality. Lisbon, Cascais, and Funchal lead; note that the most expensive municipalities increased less than the average \u2014 pressure is shifting to the interior and the outskirts.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
#<\/th>\nMunicipality<\/th>\nRent T2 2025<\/th>\nVariation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1<\/td>\nLisboa<\/strong><\/td>\n1491\u20ac<\/td>\n+3,0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nCascais<\/strong><\/td>\n1358\u20ac<\/td>\n+3,1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nFunchal<\/strong><\/td>\n1263\u20ac<\/td>\n+3,4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nOeiras<\/strong><\/td>\n1243\u20ac<\/td>\n+7,6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nSines<\/strong><\/td>\n1242\u20ac<\/td>\n+13,1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nAlmada<\/strong><\/td>\n1184\u20ac<\/td>\n+7,4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nPorto<\/strong><\/td>\n1182\u20ac<\/td>\n+6,0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nAmadora<\/strong><\/td>\n1112\u20ac<\/td>\n+7,3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n
\n \t\t\t

What these numbers mean for landlords<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

The contrast is clear: the 2026 update coefficient (2.24%)<\/a> allows for very little increase in the rents of active<\/em> contracts, while the market for new<\/em> contracts rose by 7.4% in a single year. This difference \u2014 the so-called ‘turnover premium’ \u2014 is one of the factors shaping landlords’ decisions, and one of the central themes of the new rental regime<\/a> approved in July 2026.<\/p>

To set the right rent (neither below the market nor above what the tenant can afford), use real data: check the reference value of your property in the Rental Market Simulator<\/a>, and before signing, analyze the tenant’s solvency<\/a>.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t

Market guides by district<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Analyze in detail the rents, municipalities, and trends for each district:<\/p>

Lisbon<\/a>\u00b7Porto<\/a>\u00b7Braga<\/a>\u00b7Set\u00fabal<\/a>\u00b7Faro<\/a>\u00b7Coimbra<\/a>\u00b7Aveiro<\/a>\u00b7Leiria<\/a>\u00b7\u00c9vora<\/a>\u00b7Viseu<\/a>\u00b7Viana do Castelo<\/a>\u00b7Santar\u00e9m<\/a>\u00b7Castelo Branco<\/a>\u00b7Guarda<\/a>\u00b7Beja<\/a>\u00b7Portalegre<\/a>\u00b7Bragan\u00e7a<\/a>\u00b7Vila Real<\/a>\u00b7Madeira<\/a><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n

\n \t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Methodology.<\/b> The Aluseg Rent Index aggregates residential rent values by municipality, district, and typology (primary source: INE \u2014 National Institute of Statistics, 2024 and 2025 rent series), totaling 42 037 records. The variations presented refer to the T2 typology (2-bedroom), the most representative of the rental market. The annual rent update coefficient for 2026 is 1.0224 (+2.24%), set based on inflation.<\/p>

Usage.<\/b> Data free for editorial use with the citation ‘data: Aluseg’ and a link to aluseg.com. Breakdowns by district or property type available upon request \u2014 hello@aluseg.com.<\/p>

Aluseg<\/b> \u2014 Portuguese platform for landlords: NRAU-compliant lease agreements, tenant solvency analysis, and rent simulator.aluseg.com<\/a><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rendas medianas por concelho, distrito e tipologia em Portugal. Em 2025 subiram 7,4% \u2014 mais do triplo do limite legal de 2,24%. J\u00e1 com dados de 2026. Fonte INE, 42 mil registos.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"elementor_header_footer","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-6032","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/aluseg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6032","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/aluseg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/aluseg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aluseg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aluseg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6032"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/aluseg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6032\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6046,"href":"https:\/\/aluseg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6032\/revisions\/6046"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/aluseg.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6032"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}